A wave of action has swept through the U.S. Navy following disturbing revelations of unsafe and unsanitary living conditions at the Palau Hall barracks at Andersen Air Force Base in Guam.

The Navy’s response, triggered by firsthand inspection and subsequent investigations, has prompted a service-wide review of all unaccompanied housing, with officials vowing sweeping reforms to ensure the safety and well-being of military personnel.

Photos and testimonies, obtained and published by the independent watchdog Project on Government Oversight (POGO), exposed conditions including mold-covered walls—some painted over to mask the issue—exposed electrical wiring, and dilapidated plumbing systems.

These revelations came to light following a May 2 visit by Navy Secretary John Phelan to Andersen’s Palau Hall barracks, during which he was visibly shocked.

Here's What They're Not Telling You About Your Retirement

“I actually thought the buildings were condemned,” Phelan told POGO. “When we pulled up to them and saw what shape they’re in, I was shocked.”

In response, Phelan ordered that all sailors and Marines be relocated within 10 days. By May 22, 25 Marines and 48 sailors had been moved out of Palau Hall.

Located on the U.S. territory of Guam, Andersen Air Force Base, along with Naval Base Guam and Marine Corps Base Camp Blaz, supports roughly 21,000 military-affiliated personnel. The dire conditions observed at Palau Hall were reportedly consistent across other barracks at Andersen, according to an Air Force spokesperson.

The urgency of the situation spurred Vice Adm. Scott Gray, commander of Navy Installations Command, to issue a directive on May 5 mandating inspections of all Navy barracks by May 27.

This Could Be the Most Important Video Gun Owners Watch All Year

In an internal email obtained by POGO, Gray described the conditions as “clearly unacceptable” and emphasized the need to move service members to safer accommodations if necessary.

Gray’s memo also introduced what he called the “Washington Post” test, urging inspectors to consider whether they could publicly defend the state of a facility if it were featured in a major national newspaper.

In an interview with POGO, Gray expressed a deep commitment to change. “I’m not going to let up until we get to where we need to be,” he said. “Where I can say I am proud of every barracks that we have.”

The Navy has taken additional steps in response to the crisis. New barracks at Camp Blaz were opened ahead of schedule, in part due to the deteriorating conditions at Andersen.

A Navy spokesperson, Destiny Sibert, emphasized the service’s dedication to its personnel: “Sailors’ well-being is a priority for the Navy and it’s critical to their wellness to have a safe, comfortable place to call home, whether they’re staying on a Navy base or in barracks belonging to another Service, such as with Andersen Air Force Base.”

The Air Force, while reiterating its commitment to safe living conditions, cited Typhoon Mawar in May 2023 as a significant factor contributing to the current state of the barracks.

“We prioritize permanent party unaccompanied housing requirements with dedicated facility sustainment, restoration, and modernization funds in accordance with our 4-year Dorm Master Plan,” an Air Force spokesperson said in a statement to Military Times. They noted that daily inspections are conducted by dorm leaders and that both immediate repairs and long-term investments are underway.

However, despite these assurances, some believe the Air Force has not responded with the same urgency as the Navy. René Kladzyk, author of the POGO report, told Military Times that she continues to receive anonymous tips about substandard conditions.

“I think that it’s important to emphasize that although we saw a pretty sweeping response from Navy officials to learning about these conditions at Andersen Air Force Base, we didn’t see the same response from Air Force officials who I reached out to over email,” she said.

A naval officer, who spoke to POGO anonymously due to fear of retaliation, bluntly summarized the reality on the ground: “Anybody that’s been to Guam can tell you … if you’re living on base, you’re going to be in crappy quarters.”

The issue of poor barracks conditions is not new. Junior service members have long faced inadequate housing.

The Marine Corps has already pledged nearly $11 billion under its Barracks 2030 initiative, aiming to modernize facilities by 2026, including room repairs and new furniture.

Meanwhile, the Trump administration’s recently introduced “Big Beautiful Bill,” which passed the House on May 22 and is awaiting Senate approval, includes $1 billion for barracks maintenance across all branches of the military.

Despite the evacuation of sailors and Marines from the Palau Hall barracks, approximately 430 airmen and soldiers remain in similarly affected housing, according to Kladzyk.

The Navy’s rapid response stands in contrast to other branches, highlighting ongoing disparities in housing quality and resource allocation.

While reforms are now underway, the situation in Guam underscores a deeper systemic issue that military leaders will need to confront if they are to maintain morale, readiness, and the trust of the service members they lead.

Warning: Account balances and purchasing power no longer tell the same story. Know in 2 minutes if your retirement is working for you.