In a rare public rebuke of two U.S. foreign policy flashpoints, President Donald Trump on Tuesday sharply criticized both Israel and Iran for allegedly violating a ceasefire agreement brokered just hours earlier. Speaking candidly to reporters on the South Lawn of the White House, Trump didn’t hold back.

“[Iran] violated [the ceasefire] but Israel violated it, too. ... I’m not happy with Israel,” the president said as he prepared to board Marine One en route to the NATO Summit at The Hague.

“We basically have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don’t know what the f--- they’re doing,” he added, summing up his frustration over a conflict that nearly spiraled into a regional war.

The ceasefire, which was scheduled to go into effect Tuesday morning, came after nearly two weeks of hostilities between Iran and Israel. Those clashes reignited fears of a broader conflict in the already unstable Middle East.

Here's What They're Not Telling You About Your Retirement

Tensions had escalated rapidly following the United States’ direct military involvement in Operation Midnight Hammer, a series of precision strikes on Iranian nuclear sites at Fordo, Natanz, and Isfahan.

Iran responded with what it called a proportional retaliatory missile attack on Al-Udeid Air Base in Qatar—a key hub for U.S. military operations in the region. Tehran reportedly warned the U.S. ahead of time, and the strike resulted in no casualties. Trump dismissed the attack as a “very weak response,” adding on Truth Social, “they’ve gotten it all out of their system.”

Al-Udeid houses the U.S. Air Force’s Combined Air Operations Center and the 379th Air Expeditionary Wing, making it a vital link in America’s military presence in the Middle East.

While Iran’s strike may have appeared measured, allegations quickly emerged from both sides that the ceasefire was being violated. Israel accused Iran of launching a missile into its airspace early Tuesday, a claim Tehran’s state media denied. Iran countered with accusations that Israel had carried out three separate waves of strikes.

This Could Be the Most Important Video Gun Owners Watch All Year

Following recent reports that Congress is considering a nationwide voter ID requirement for federal elections, do you support requiring voters to show identification before casting a ballot?

By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from Common Defense, occasional offers from our partners and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement.

The Israeli government, however, signaled a shift in posture following President Trump’s intervention. A statement from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office indicated that Israel dialed back its response after a direct conversation with Trump.

“Following President Trump’s conversation with Prime Minister Netanyahu, Israel refrained from additional attacks,” the statement said, confirming the White House’s influence over the timing and scale of Israeli military decisions.

Despite the flurry of activity and allegations, President Trump maintained that the ceasefire remained in effect.

“ISRAEL is not going to attack Iran,” he posted on Truth Social. “All planes will turn around and head home, while doing a friendly ‘Plane Wave’ to Iran.”

The statement was vintage Trump—blunt, colorful, and diplomatically unorthodox—but it underscored his administration’s desire to de-escalate a volatile situation quickly.

The ceasefire’s fragile status highlights the precarious nature of diplomacy in the region, particularly when old adversaries with deep-seated hostilities are involved.

While some in the international community may have hoped the ceasefire would mark a turning point, Trump’s own skepticism reflected the complex reality.

As Trump departed for the NATO Summit, the international stage braced for further developments.

The president’s remarks cast doubt on whether either Iran or Israel would adhere to the agreement long-term, but his tone also suggested that Washington’s role as a mediator remains central.

His unfiltered comments, especially his critique of Israel, marked a notable departure from previous U.S. administrations, which have typically avoided public criticism of America’s closest Middle Eastern ally.

Yet it also reflected Trump’s transactional, results-driven approach to foreign policy—one in which outcomes matter more than long-standing allegiances.

With the NATO Summit on the horizon and the Middle East on edge, the effectiveness of the ceasefire and the durability of America’s influence in the region are likely to be key topics in upcoming diplomatic discussions.

For now, though, President Trump’s blunt assessment rings loudest: “They don’t know what the f--- they’re doing.”

Whether that frustration will translate into more lasting peace or further discord remains to be seen.

WATCH THE VIDEO:

Warning: Account balances and purchasing power no longer tell the same story. Know in 2 minutes if your retirement is working for you.