Fort Hood military leaders moved quickly after a patient reported disturbing conduct at the Carl R. Darnall Army Medical Center, and the doctor involved was removed from clinical duty while investigators opened a probe.
Army Criminal Investigation Division agents began an inquiry “within hours” of the allegation, and Fort Hood officials said the provider was no longer seeing patients as the investigation proceeded.
The unit declined to identify the doctor or discuss the specifics while authorities investigate, and that silence has left many on the post looking for answers and for accountability.
Two civilian attorneys have told reporters they represent multiple patients who say the OB GYN doctor took photos and videos during exams, and those claims have amplified public concern.
Here's What They're Not Telling You About Your Retirement
Andrew Cobos, a former Army officer who now practices personal injury law, said his firm is representing 12 of the provider’s patients.
Christine Dunn of Sanford Heisler Sharp McKnight said she represents three of the doctor’s patients and that other potential victims have contacted her.
Cobos’ firm said in an email that some of the patients allege the suspended doctor “covertly” photographed and video recorded them during OB-GYN exams and suggested “unnecessary medical procedures.”
The lawyers also allege that the doctor kept a personal cell phone in their breast pocket during examinations, which was the source of the photos and videos.
This Could Be the Most Important Video Gun Owners Watch All Year
Dunn said her clients “didn’t have any inkling that this had gone on,” until they met with Army Criminal Investigation Division officials and were shown screenshots of themselves from the videos.
One woman, according to a statement provided to reporters by Cobos, said she first heard from CID on Oct. 23 asking her to come in and answer questions about her current medical provider.
She met with CID agents on Oct. 24 and was shown a screenshot of a video taken during her appointment in mid October, and the meeting left her shaken and without clear answers.
“When I got to my car, I broke down. I sat there crying — trying to process what had just happened. This was a doctor I trusted. A doctor who made me feel heard and cared for,” the patient wrote in her statement.
“I was left questioning everything — the care I received, the system that was supposed to protect me, and whether I or my daughters could ever truly be safe in a doctor’s office again,” she added.
Fort Hood officials said they are reaching out to all patients of the provider and that CID agents have been contacting those who were potentially affected.
Both attorneys told reporters they are preparing to file Federal Tort Claims Act complaints against the Army as a civil remedy for their clients.
FTCA complaints can lead to civil lawsuits, and if filed the Army would have six months to investigate the claims and then decide whether to settle or deny them, which in turn could open the door to further litigation.
Those civil claims are separate from any criminal charges that might be brought under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, and the two tracks could proceed at different paces.
Supporters of President Trump and Secretary of War Pete Hegseth have argued that this case underscores the need for swift, decisive leadership in the ranks, because victims deserve answers and the institution must protect those who serve and their families.
At the same time critics on the left have called for broad cultural change in military medicine, but many conservatives say the first priority must be an orderly, transparent investigation that respects due process while empowering victims.
Dunn emphasized the depth of concern among patients, saying “It’s hard to believe that it could happen to this many patients without there being some red flags, without someone seeing something that this should have caused concern.”
That line of questioning will likely focus on oversight of military medical providers, the reporting channels available to patients, and how quickly leadership at the installation and at higher levels were alerted.
For now the primary facts are that a provider was suspended, CID agents opened an investigation “within hours,” and multiple patients have come forward with allegations that are now moving into both criminal and civil tracks.
Those developments will be watched closely by those who demand accountability inside the military and by communities that expect safe, respectful medical care for service members and their families.
As investigations proceed, officials say patients are being offered support services and will be contacted about next steps, and families will be watching for both justice and reforms that prevent any repeat of what these patients describe.
Join the Discussion
COMMENTS POLICY: We have no tolerance for messages of violence, racism, vulgarity, obscenity or other such discourteous behavior. Thank you for contributing to a respectful and useful online dialogue.