The U.S. Navy’s never-ending saga of delays with its Ford-class aircraft carriers just got longer.

The USS Doris Miller, the fourth carrier in the series meant to represent the future of naval power, is now officially running two years behind schedule. Instead of arriving in 2032, the carrier won’t hit the fleet until February 2034.

The reason? A familiar blend of supply chain setbacks and construction bottlenecks at Newport News Shipbuilding in Virginia.

According to the Navy’s own fiscal 2027 shipbuilding plan, space limitations at the Huntington Ingalls shipyard are slowing things down.

Here's What They're Not Telling You About Your Retirement

The primary culprit is not the Miller itself, but the ship ahead of it — the USS Enterprise, CVN-80, which has run into its own wave of snags. Because the Enterprise is occupying the only available final assembly area accessible by the shipyard’s heavy-lift crane, the Doris Miller’s start date got kicked down the line once again.

“The primary schedule driver for CVN-81 is the lack of available shipyard construction space for large assemblies due to delays on CVN-80,” a Navy official admitted.

In plain English, one ship is stuck behind another that’s already late, and the ripple effect is now costing the nation more time and resources.

The Enterprise’s own delivery date was originally July 2030. That’s now been pushed nearly a year to March 2031 because of a “delay in critical path construction required for launch of the ship,” as Navy budget documents spell out. Apparently, even critical equipment showed up late — a recurring theme across multiple Ford-class builds.

This Could Be the Most Important Video Gun Owners Watch All Year

Following ongoing debates over border security and immigration policy in 2026, do you support stricter enforcement measures?

By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from Common Defense, occasional offers from our partners and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement.
Pentagon Extends Dual-Carrier Deployment in Middle East to Sustain Pressure on Houthis
Image Credit: DoW
181212-N-GC347-0105 ATLANTIC OCEAN (Dec. 12, 2018) The Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Harry S. Truman (CVN 75) transits the sea. Harry S. Truman will continue to foster cooperation with regional allies and partners, strengthen regional stability, and remain vigilant, agile and dynamic. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Scott Swofford/Released)

A spokesperson for Newport News Shipbuilding explained it this way: “CVN-80 construction delays result from late arrival of large, sequence-critical equipment that hindered the initial structural build of the ship in the dry dock. All of the delayed critical material has since arrived.”

That’s bureaucratic-speak for: the parts got here late, and now the entire Navy is waiting.

The Doris Miller’s construction is expected to finally begin later this year, assuming no new roadblocks appear. But considering the Ford-class’s track record, few in uniform are holding their breath.

In fact, even earlier Navy budget estimates from 2025 already flagged “supply chain issues” that initially delayed the Miller’s milestones from 2029 to 2030.

Both the Enterprise and Doris Miller were purchased together in 2019 as part of a combined two-ship deal. The goal was to save money and shorten construction timelines.

USS Gerald R. Ford Enters the Mediterranean, Strengthening Allied Naval Presence
Image Credit: DoW
The first-in-class aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN 78) transits the Atlantic Ocean, March 19, 2023. Ford is underway in the Atlantic Ocean executing its Composite Training Unit Exercise (COMPTUEX), an intense, multi-week exercise designed to fully integrate a carrier strike group as a cohesive, multi-mission fighting force and to test their ability to carry out sustained combat operations from the sea. As the first-in-class ship of Ford-class aircraft carriers, CVN 78 represents a generational leap in the U.S. Navy’s capacity to project power on a global scale. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Jackson Adkins)

Yet, according to the current plan, it will now take 12 years to complete the Enterprise and an astonishing 15 years to deliver the Doris Miller. That’s not exactly an endorsement of the efficiency of the two-ship approach.

And this isn’t just a Doris Miller problem. The entire Ford-class project has been plagued by developmental and manufacturing headaches since day one.

The second ship, USS John F. Kennedy, originally slated for July 2025, is now pushed back to March 2027. The holdup there? Completion of its Advanced Arresting Gear certification and continuing struggles with the Advanced Weapons Elevators — the same cutting-edge systems that once delayed the lead ship, USS Gerald R. Ford, for years.

The Ford itself, after massive overruns and breakdowns in both nuclear propulsion and weapons systems, finally deployed — years behind schedule — but only after becoming a case study in how overpromising and underdelivering can cripple even the world’s most advanced navy.

Former Navy Secretary John Phelan admitted publicly in April that the service was now reviewing the cost-effectiveness of future Ford-class carriers, including the USS William J. Clinton and USS George W. Bush, to “make sure that they make sense.”

That sort of language suggests that even the brass knows these ships have turned into runaway spending projects.

The irony here is rich. At a time when America’s adversaries are ramping up ship production at lightning speed, the U.S. Navy is still bogged down in decade-and-a-half build times for a single carrier.

China launches entire fleets while the Navy is still untangling construction space “constraints.”

Nimitz Heads to Final Deployment as Decommissioning Nears
Image Credit: DoW
PACIFIC OCEAN (June 9, 2023) The aircraft carrier USS Nimitz (CVN 68) steams into formation during a multiple large deck event. Ships involved in the event are the Nimitz-class aircraft carriers Nimitz and USS Ronald Reagan (CVN 76); the Ticonderoga-class guided-missile cruisers USS Robert Smalls (CG 62), USS Bunker Hill (CG 52) and USS Antietam (CG 54); the Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyers USS Wayne E. Meyer (DDG 108), USS Rafael Peralta (DDG 115) and USS Chung-Hoon (DDG 93); Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force Izumo-class destroyer JS Izumo (DDH 183) and Murasame-class destroyer JS Samidare (DD 106); and French Navy Aquitaine-class frigate FS Lorraine (D 657). Nimitz is in U.S. 7th Fleet conducting routine operations. U.S. 7th Fleet is the U.S. Navy's largest forward-deployed numbered fleet, and routinely interacts and operates with allies and partners in preserving a free and open Indo-Pacific region. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Kenneth Lagadi)

This kind of delay is not merely a budget issue — it’s a national security issue. A stretched-thin fleet can’t meet global demands, and the longer these delays drag on, the weaker America’s naval deterrence becomes.

It’s no wonder leaders like War Secretary Pete Hegseth have pushed for overhauling bureaucratic inefficiency and bringing more accountability to the War Department’s contracting process.

Every extra month in delay isn’t just time — it’s billions of taxpayer dollars wrapped up in red tape, parked under cranes in Virginia.

America’s sailors deserve ships that work and arrive on time, not another costly case study in how defense procurement turned into a swamp of delay and excuses.

Unless the Navy gets serious about cutting through its own gridlock, the USS Doris Miller will be stuck as another cautionary tale in a long line of delayed dreams and bloated budgets.

The fleet can’t deter enemies on paper plans. It takes real steel in the water — and right now, that steel is sitting in drydock.

Warning: Account balances and purchasing power no longer tell the same story. Know in 2 minutes if your retirement is working for you.