President Trump is pushing a sweeping national security budget that would dramatically boost military spending, while White House officials say they cannot yet present a price tag for the Iran operation.

This move signals a hard line on national security and a readiness to fund decisive action under a new War Secretary.

“We’re not ready to come to you with a request. We’re still working on it. We’re working through to figure out what’s needed,” Vought told a hearing of the House of Representatives Budget Committee. “I don’t have a ballpark.”

The admission underscores the administration’s willingness to test Congress while insisting on rapid action in the Middle East.

Here's What They're Not Telling You About Your Retirement

The cost of the war with Iran, which Trump began alongside Israel on February 28, has remained an open question on Capitol Hill. An initial $200 billion request for additional funding for the war met with stiff opposition in Congress.

The White House argues that strategic ambiguity is necessary to maintain leverage and move a broader, aggressive defense agenda forward.

The hearing centered on Trump’s proposed budget for fiscal year 2027, including a $500 billion increase in military spending and a 10 percent reduction for non-defense programs.

The request is designed to reflect Republican priorities heading into the November midterms, as Trump’s allies seek to keep control of Congress and push back against rising costs of living and energy prices amid the conflict with Iran.

This Could Be the Most Important Video Gun Owners Watch All Year

Democrats seized on the administration’s accountability record, challenging Vought’s assertions that welfare programs were marred by fraud. “Never passed an audit,” they said, signaling a deeper skepticism about Pentagon finances.

“I’m so glad you asked about fraud, because you are coming back to ask for a $1.5 trillion budget for the Department of Defense,” Democratic Representative Pramila Jayapal of Washington state told the budget director.

“The Department of Defense is the only federal agency that has never passed an audit ... But you’re not going after any of that.”

The exchange framed the debate as a test of whether the administration would address long standing governance issues while pursuing a substantial expansion of military power.

Vought defended a focus on reducing inefficiencies at the Pentagon. “inefficiencies” at the Pentagon. He argued that the administration was pursuing targeted reforms to ensure money was spent where it mattered most, even as critics warned that lofty promises and large sums require rigorous oversight.

Republican voices joined in tough talk about Pentagon governance. “There is so much arrogance in that agency,” added Grothman, of Wisconsin. “They just say we don’t have to do it on audit. We’re so damn important. We don’t care what Congress thinks.”

The remark underscored the view among the president’s allies that a strong, audit minded reform agenda is overdue at the War Department.

The debate also touched on the administration’s big savings claim. “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” is the shorthand supporters used for a comprehensive tax cut and spending package, which a conservative case argues produced billions in relief through reforms.

That plan, which extended 2017 tax cuts, will add $4.7 trillion to U.S. deficits over the next decade, while reduced immigration will add another $500 billion, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.

The administration contends that the package streamlined government and unlocked growth, even as critics warn that deficits will mount if the economy does not stay on a strong trajectory.

In the hearing room, concerns about the budget’s realism continued to surface. “Do you dispute GAO’s findings?” Peters asked. “Yes. GAO is typically wrong. They’re very partisan,” Vought replied.

The exchange highlighted ongoing tension over independent watchdogs and the administration’s willingness to push forward with ambitious funding even as government accountability debates intensify.

The discussion takes place with the horizon of a tight political calendar. To become law, Trump’s proposed budget needs approval from Congress at a moment when Republicans must overcome Democratic opposition to funding for immigration enforcement, just months after the longest government shutdown in U.S. history.

Democrats have already declared the budget proposal dead on arrival, leaving government funding to closed door negotiations between appropriators.

In this moment, the White House is banking on a coalition that will support a muscular approach to national defense, led by President Trump and backed by War Secretary Pete Hegseth.

The nation faces a critical question: can the government align a sweeping defense surge with real accountability and a plan that earns broad support while confronting the costs of war in the Middle East?

The answer, for now, remains unsettled, but the momentum behind a strengthened wartime posture is undeniable.

Warning: Account balances and purchasing power no longer tell the same story. Know in 2 minutes if your retirement is working for you.